Review: The Ring
The Ring is a remake of the box office Japanese smash
Ringu. It spawned a sequel Ringu 2 and a prequel
Ringu 0.
Now let's see what the American critics had to say about the flick.
Roger Ebert:
2 stars
Rotten Tomatoes:
71% fresh rating
So of course being the horror buff I have seen both the Japanese original and the sequel. Now lets compare.
Most good horror movies liked by American critics (who btw normally don't watch horror because as we all know it's considered so low on the genre scale [slightly above Skinemax and a couple of notches above straight to video action starring Lorenzo Lamas] ) like horror movies to be ambigious, visually stylistic and based in gothic books and novels.
So the Ring is from a Japanese manga (comic book for you non fanboys) and for an American remake its actually quite good. The Japanese film might have lost something in the subtitle translation. It paced along, lots of talking, lots of staring, lots of exterior shots. Gore Verbinski's version is just as good, if not better. He basically does what Americans do best, takes an original idea and makes it better.
Let's start off the review. *******SPOILERS AHEAD!*******
Naomi Watts is not too hard to look at. Big plus. She plays the standard role of investigating and more investigating. And she happens to be a reporter for the Seattle PI.
You've got your gratuitous cute kid that whispers alot (a description coined by my friend), the crazy old man, a scared horse that runs amuck, the 9yr old girl (possessed)
and some visual imagery that only a good special effects company can only provide.
If you already don't know the story The Ring is about a mysterious video tape that when watched, forewarns you that you have 7 days to live.
The Ring, because I already knew the story and twists ahead of time, is a good story based upon all those urban legends you basically would find on
Snopes
I'll have to agree with Ebert. The movie explains and explains and explains why this is happening, the origins of the tape, the evil, etc. But it's necessary. The average American movie goer is not too smart. If somebody makes a copy of the tape it's labled "Copy". Yes Virginia we are this dumb. The Japanese version doesn't take this into consideration so you kind of vaguely know what the gist of the story is but not totally.
My friend came up with a good point. He said if a horror film has actors and actresses who are no-names this actually enhances the flick. You'll actually pay attention to plot, dialogue and settings. I mean doesn't it disturb you when you see Katie Holmes playing a college student. That's Katie Holmes! Angelina Jolie is starring as a mob boss's daughter's secretary?!? I don't get the plot but hell that's the girl from Tomb Raider! Best example: the black guy from Boogie Nights. No matter what movie that is. He's the black guy from
Boogie Nights. When is he going to talk about HI-FI's?
Some final thoughts. The Ring is basically mindless horror. It's got the basic premise, taunts you with potential scary scenes and then explains what the "evil" is. Visually, the remake adds some nice touches. Watt's acting is not stellar but how can you top your performance in
Mullholland Drive's? I mean really.
Finally you've got your basic twist ending which initiates your sequel and thus your trilogy.
Hollywood is running out of ideas. Godfather 4? Egads! They actually roadblocked the Japanese version from coming into the US. It's inevitable they'll be remaking some other Japanese film. I hear Pulse is in development. NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I can only predict some Hollywood exec proposing "Hey I just watched this horror film from this director named Takashi Miike. The movie is called Audition."
Double NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
See the Ring. Break box office records. Maybe this will initiate the next wave of American horror. Nah.